code-review-graph vs planning-with-files
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- planning-with-files is growing faster: +855 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +330 for code-review-graph.
- Pick code-review-graph for: local code knowledge graph serving compact review context to AI coding tools over MCP. Pick planning-with-files for: persistent file-based planning and context recovery for AI coding agents and long-running tasks.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
c
code-review-graphopen-source
Local code knowledge graph serving compact review context to AI coding tools over MCP
p
planning-with-filesopen-source
Persistent file-based planning and context recovery for AI coding agents and long-running tasks
Metrics
| code-review-graph | planning-with-files | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 31.9k | 27.3k |
| Star velocity /mo | 330 | 855 |
| Commits (90d) | 665 | 228 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.7583554607364194 | 0.8197688987894155 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, code-review-graph or planning-with-files?
- code-review-graph has more GitHub stars (31,898 vs 27,262).
- Which is more actively developed, code-review-graph or planning-with-files?
- code-review-graph had more commits in the last 90 days (665 vs 228).
- Should I use code-review-graph or planning-with-files?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.