code-review-graph vs Context Mode
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Context Mode is growing faster: +7,280 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +220 for code-review-graph.
- Pick code-review-graph for: local code knowledge graph serving compact review context to AI coding tools over MCP. Pick Context Mode for: mCP server that sandboxes tool output, persists session memory, and enforces routing across platforms.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
c
code-review-graphopen-source
Local code knowledge graph serving compact review context to AI coding tools over MCP
C
Context Modeopen-source
MCP server that sandboxes tool output, persists session memory, and enforces routing across platforms
Metrics
| code-review-graph | Context Mode | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 31.9k | 25.1k |
| Star velocity /mo | 220 | 7.3k |
| Commits (90d) | 665 | 141 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | — | 88.9K |
| Overall score | 0.7208179595910345 | 0.8332926937375552 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, code-review-graph or Context Mode?
- code-review-graph has more GitHub stars (31,898 vs 25,150).
- Which is more actively developed, code-review-graph or Context Mode?
- code-review-graph had more commits in the last 90 days (665 vs 141).
- Should I use code-review-graph or Context Mode?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.