cocoindex vs Supermemory
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Supermemory is growing faster: +280 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +40 for cocoindex.
- Pick cocoindex for: incremental engine for long horizon agents Star if you like it. Pick Supermemory for: memory and context engine + app that is extremely fast, scalable, and can be run fully locally.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
c
cocoindexopen-source
Incremental engine for long horizon agents π Star if you like it!
S
Supermemoryopen-source
Memory and context engine + app that is extremely fast, scalable, and can be run fully locally. The Memory API for the AI era.
Metrics
| cocoindex | Supermemory | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 11.6k | 31.1k |
| Star velocity /mo | 40 | 280 |
| Commits (90d) | 133 | 187 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.6236213430196258 | 0.730923354028454 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, cocoindex or Supermemory?
- Supermemory has more GitHub stars (31,067 vs 11,642).
- Which is more actively developed, cocoindex or Supermemory?
- Supermemory had more commits in the last 90 days (187 vs 133).
- Should I use cocoindex or Supermemory?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.