Claude-Mem vs OpenViking
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Claude-Mem is growing faster: +2,090 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +990 for OpenViking.
- Claude-Mem is freemium; OpenViking is open-source.
- Pick Claude-Mem for: captures and compresses agent activity to provide relevant context across coding sessions. Pick OpenViking for: self-evolving Context Database for AI Agents.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
C
Claude-Memfreemium
Captures and compresses agent activity to provide relevant context across coding sessions
O
OpenVikingopen-source
Self-evolving Context Database for AI Agents. Unify Agent Memory, Knowledge RAG and Skills.
Metrics
| Claude-Mem | OpenViking | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 95.2k | 39.2k |
| Star velocity /mo | 2.1k | 990 |
| Commits (90d) | 844 | 1.0k |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | 68.7K | 441.3K |
| Overall score | 0.8787883211640553 | 0.8645490564903204 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Claude-Mem or OpenViking?
- Claude-Mem has more GitHub stars (95,227 vs 39,153).
- Which is more actively developed, Claude-Mem or OpenViking?
- OpenViking had more commits in the last 90 days (1,047 vs 844).
- Should I use Claude-Mem or OpenViking?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.