Claude-Mem vs Graft
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Claude-Mem is growing faster: +2,295 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +1,065 for Graft.
- Claude-Mem is freemium; Graft is open-source.
- Pick Claude-Mem for: captures and compresses agent activity to provide relevant context across coding sessions. Pick Graft for: turbocharge Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini & every coding agent: faster, cheaper, with contextual.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
C
Claude-Memfreemium
Captures and compresses agent activity to provide relevant context across coding sessions
G
Graftopen-source
Turbocharge Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini & every coding agent: faster, cheaper, with contextual understanding specific to your codebase.
Metrics
| Claude-Mem | Graft | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 95.2k | 9.5k |
| Star velocity /mo | 2.3k | 1.1k |
| Commits (90d) | 844 | 506 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 0 |
| Overall score | 0.8875327757878193 | 0.7281102466707609 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Claude-Mem or Graft?
- Claude-Mem has more GitHub stars (95,171 vs 9,504).
- Which is more actively developed, Claude-Mem or Graft?
- Claude-Mem had more commits in the last 90 days (844 vs 506).
- Should I use Claude-Mem or Graft?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.