Claude-Mem vs code-review-graph
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Claude-Mem is growing faster: +2,090 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +220 for code-review-graph.
- Claude-Mem is freemium; code-review-graph is open-source.
- Pick Claude-Mem for: captures and compresses agent activity to provide relevant context across coding sessions. Pick code-review-graph for: local code knowledge graph serving compact review context to AI coding tools over MCP.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
C
Claude-Memfreemium
Captures and compresses agent activity to provide relevant context across coding sessions
c
code-review-graphopen-source
Local code knowledge graph serving compact review context to AI coding tools over MCP
Metrics
| Claude-Mem | code-review-graph | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 95.2k | 31.9k |
| Star velocity /mo | 2.1k | 220 |
| Commits (90d) | 844 | 665 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | 68.7K | — |
| Overall score | 0.8787883211640553 | 0.7208179595910345 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Claude-Mem or code-review-graph?
- Claude-Mem has more GitHub stars (95,227 vs 31,898).
- Which is more actively developed, Claude-Mem or code-review-graph?
- Claude-Mem had more commits in the last 90 days (844 vs 665).
- Should I use Claude-Mem or code-review-graph?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.