claude-context vs serena
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- serena is growing faster: +380 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +60 for claude-context.
- Pick claude-context for: code search MCP for Claude Code. Pick serena for: a powerful MCP toolkit for coding, providing semantic retrieval and editing capabilities - the IDE.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
c
claude-contextopen-source
Code search MCP for Claude Code. Make entire codebase the context for any coding agent.
s
serenaopen-source
A powerful MCP toolkit for coding, providing semantic retrieval and editing capabilities - the IDE for your agent
Metrics
| claude-context | serena | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 12.6k | 30.0k |
| Star velocity /mo | 60 | 380 |
| Commits (90d) | 3 | 394 |
| Releases (6m) | 0 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.32840845556512543 | 0.773024478061336 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, claude-context or serena?
- serena has more GitHub stars (29,955 vs 12,586).
- Which is more actively developed, claude-context or serena?
- serena had more commits in the last 90 days (394 vs 3).
- Should I use claude-context or serena?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.