claude-context vs QwenLM/qwen-code
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- QwenLM/qwen-code is growing faster: +410 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +60 for claude-context.
- Pick claude-context for: code search MCP for Claude Code. Pick QwenLM/qwen-code for: an open-source AI coding agent that lives in your terminal.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
c
claude-contextopen-source
Code search MCP for Claude Code. Make entire codebase the context for any coding agent.
Q
QwenLM/qwen-codeopen-source
An open-source AI coding agent that lives in your terminal.
Metrics
| claude-context | QwenLM/qwen-code | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 12.6k | 28.3k |
| Star velocity /mo | 60 | 410 |
| Commits (90d) | 3 | 3.5k |
| Releases (6m) | 0 | 10 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | — | 548 |
| Overall score | 0.32840845556512543 | 0.8472626810588997 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, claude-context or QwenLM/qwen-code?
- QwenLM/qwen-code has more GitHub stars (28,283 vs 12,586).
- Which is more actively developed, claude-context or QwenLM/qwen-code?
- QwenLM/qwen-code had more commits in the last 90 days (3,463 vs 3).
- Should I use claude-context or QwenLM/qwen-code?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.