claude-context vs omp
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- omp is growing faster: +3,030 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +75 for claude-context.
- Pick claude-context for: code search MCP for Claude Code. Pick omp for: ⌥ Coding agent with the IDE wired in.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
c
claude-contextopen-source
Code search MCP for Claude Code. Make entire codebase the context for any coding agent.
o
ompopen-source
⌥ Coding agent with the IDE wired in. Built by Stencil Labs.
Metrics
| claude-context | omp | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 12.6k | 34.1k |
| Star velocity /mo | 75 | 3.0k |
| Commits (90d) | 3 | 14.0k |
| Releases (6m) | 0 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.3535113474620865 | 0.9384072578113428 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, claude-context or omp?
- omp has more GitHub stars (34,075 vs 12,585).
- Which is more actively developed, claude-context or omp?
- omp had more commits in the last 90 days (13,995 vs 3).
- Should I use claude-context or omp?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.