claude-context vs HyperFrames
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- HyperFrames is growing faster: +14,430 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +75 for claude-context.
- Pick claude-context for: code search MCP for Claude Code. Pick HyperFrames for: write HTML.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
c
claude-contextopen-source
Code search MCP for Claude Code. Make entire codebase the context for any coding agent.
H
HyperFramesopen-source
Write HTML. Render video. Built for agents.
Metrics
| claude-context | HyperFrames | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 12.6k | 55.6k |
| Star velocity /mo | 75 | 14.4k |
| Commits (90d) | 3 | 2.9k |
| Releases (6m) | 0 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.3535113474620865 | 0.9467131295947988 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, claude-context or HyperFrames?
- HyperFrames has more GitHub stars (55,595 vs 12,585).
- Which is more actively developed, claude-context or HyperFrames?
- HyperFrames had more commits in the last 90 days (2,927 vs 3).
- Should I use claude-context or HyperFrames?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.