claude-context vs code-review-graph
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- code-review-graph is growing faster: +220 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +60 for claude-context.
- Pick claude-context for: code search MCP for Claude Code. Pick code-review-graph for: local code knowledge graph serving compact review context to AI coding tools over MCP.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
c
claude-contextopen-source
Code search MCP for Claude Code. Make entire codebase the context for any coding agent.
c
code-review-graphopen-source
Local code knowledge graph serving compact review context to AI coding tools over MCP
Metrics
| claude-context | code-review-graph | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 12.6k | 31.9k |
| Star velocity /mo | 60 | 220 |
| Commits (90d) | 3 | 665 |
| Releases (6m) | 0 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.32840845556512543 | 0.7208179595910345 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, claude-context or code-review-graph?
- code-review-graph has more GitHub stars (31,898 vs 12,586).
- Which is more actively developed, claude-context or code-review-graph?
- code-review-graph had more commits in the last 90 days (665 vs 3).
- Should I use claude-context or code-review-graph?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.