Which is more popular, Claude Code or OpenHands?

Claude Code has more GitHub stars (148,932 vs 89,796).

Which is more actively developed, Claude Code or OpenHands?

OpenHands had more commits in the last 90 days (667 vs 210).

Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.

Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools

Claude Code is growing faster: +10,387 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +3,159 for OpenHands.
Pick Claude Code for: agentic coding tool that understands codebases and handles tasks and Git workflows from your terminal. Pick OpenHands for: openHands: AI-Driven Development.

From GitHub data refreshed daily.

Agentic coding tool that understands codebases and handles tasks and Git workflows from your terminal

🙌 OpenHands: AI-Driven Development

+Natural language interface eliminates the need to memorize complex command syntax and enables intuitive interaction with development tools
+Deep codebase understanding allows for contextually relevant suggestions and automated workflows that consider your entire project structure
+Cross-platform compatibility with multiple installation methods and integration options including terminal, IDE, and GitHub environments

+Multiple interface options (SDK, CLI, GUI) allowing developers to choose the best fit for their workflow and technical expertise
+Highly scalable architecture that supports both local development and cloud deployment of thousands of agents simultaneously
+Strong performance with 77.6 SWEBench score and active community support with nearly 70,000 GitHub stars

-Requires active internet connection and API access to function, creating dependency on external services
-Data collection for feedback purposes may raise privacy concerns for developers working on sensitive or proprietary codebases
-As a relatively new tool, long-term stability and feature consistency may be less established compared to traditional development tools

-Complex setup process with multiple components and repositories that may overwhelm new users
-Limited documentation clarity with information scattered across different repositories and interfaces
-Requires significant technical knowledge to effectively configure and customize agents for specific development needs

•Automating routine git workflows like branch management, commit message generation, and merge conflict resolution through natural language commands
•Explaining complex legacy code or unfamiliar codebases to help developers quickly understand intricate patterns and architectural decisions
•Executing repetitive coding tasks such as refactoring, test generation, and boilerplate code creation without manual implementation

•Automating repetitive coding tasks and software development workflows across large development teams
•Building custom AI development assistants tailored to specific project requirements and coding standards
•Scaling AI-assisted development operations from individual developers to enterprise-level cloud deployments

Which is more popular, Claude Code or OpenHands?: Claude Code has more GitHub stars (148,932 vs 89,796).
Which is more actively developed, Claude Code or OpenHands?: OpenHands had more commits in the last 90 days (667 vs 210).
Should I use Claude Code or OpenHands?: Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.