Which is more popular, Claude Code or GPT-Code?

Claude Code has more GitHub stars (149,027 vs 3,535).

Which is more actively developed, Claude Code or GPT-Code?

Claude Code had more commits in the last 90 days (211 vs 0).

Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.

Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools

GPT-Code has had no commit in 38 months; Claude Code is actively maintained (211 commits in the last 90 days).
Claude Code is growing faster: +10,347 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +-6 for GPT-Code.
Pick Claude Code for: agentic coding tool that understands codebases and handles tasks and Git workflows from your terminal. Pick GPT-Code for: an open source implementation of OpenAI's ChatGPT Code interpreter.

From GitHub data refreshed daily.

Agentic coding tool that understands codebases and handles tasks and Git workflows from your terminal

GPT-Codeopen-source

An open source implementation of OpenAI's ChatGPT Code interpreter

+Natural language interface eliminates the need to memorize complex command syntax and enables intuitive interaction with development tools
+Deep codebase understanding allows for contextually relevant suggestions and automated workflows that consider your entire project structure
+Cross-platform compatibility with multiple installation methods and integration options including terminal, IDE, and GitHub environments

+Simple installation via pip with one-command startup (pip install gpt-code-ui && gptcode)
+Full context awareness maintains conversation history and can reference previous code executions
+File upload/download support enables working with external data sources and exporting results

-Requires active internet connection and API access to function, creating dependency on external services
-Data collection for feedback purposes may raise privacy concerns for developers working on sensitive or proprietary codebases
-As a relatively new tool, long-term stability and feature consistency may be less established compared to traditional development tools

-Limited to Python code execution only, cannot run other programming languages
-Requires OpenAI API key and incurs usage costs for each interaction
-No apparent built-in security isolation or sandboxing details mentioned for code execution safety

•Automating routine git workflows like branch management, commit message generation, and merge conflict resolution through natural language commands
•Explaining complex legacy code or unfamiliar codebases to help developers quickly understand intricate patterns and architectural decisions
•Executing repetitive coding tasks such as refactoring, test generation, and boilerplate code creation without manual implementation

•Data analysis and visualization projects where you need AI assistance to generate charts and insights
•Rapid prototyping and proof-of-concept development with AI-generated code snippets
•Educational scenarios for learning Python programming through AI-guided code generation

Which is more popular, Claude Code or GPT-Code?: Claude Code has more GitHub stars (149,027 vs 3,535).
Which is more actively developed, Claude Code or GPT-Code?: Claude Code had more commits in the last 90 days (211 vs 0).
Should I use Claude Code or GPT-Code?: Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.