Which is more popular, Claude Code or Devika?

Claude Code has more GitHub stars (148,932 vs 19,556).

Which is more actively developed, Claude Code or Devika?

Claude Code had more commits in the last 90 days (210 vs 0).

Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.

Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools

Devika has had no commit in 12 months; Claude Code is actively maintained (210 commits in the last 90 days).
Claude Code is growing faster: +10,387 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +9 for Devika.
Pick Claude Code for: agentic coding tool that understands codebases and handles tasks and Git workflows from your terminal. Pick Devika for: devika is the first open-source implementation of an Agentic Software Engineer.

From GitHub data refreshed daily.

Agentic coding tool that understands codebases and handles tasks and Git workflows from your terminal

Devikaopen-source

Devika is the first open-source implementation of an Agentic Software Engineer. Initially started as an open-source alternative to Devin.

+Natural language interface eliminates the need to memorize complex command syntax and enables intuitive interaction with development tools
+Deep codebase understanding allows for contextually relevant suggestions and automated workflows that consider your entire project structure
+Cross-platform compatibility with multiple installation methods and integration options including terminal, IDE, and GitHub environments

+Multi-LLM support with flexibility to choose from commercial providers (Claude 3, GPT-4, Gemini) or run local models via Ollama
+Comprehensive AI capabilities including planning, reasoning, web research, and multi-language code generation in a single platform
+Open-source alternative to proprietary solutions like Devin, allowing community contributions and customization

-Requires active internet connection and API access to function, creating dependency on external services
-Data collection for feedback purposes may raise privacy concerns for developers working on sensitive or proprietary codebases
-As a relatively new tool, long-term stability and feature consistency may be less established compared to traditional development tools

-Currently in early development/experimental stage with many unimplemented and broken features
-Requires specific Python version constraints (>= 3.10 and < 3.12) which may limit compatibility
-Performance heavily dependent on chosen LLM provider, with optimal results requiring paid commercial models

•Automating routine git workflows like branch management, commit message generation, and merge conflict resolution through natural language commands
•Explaining complex legacy code or unfamiliar codebases to help developers quickly understand intricate patterns and architectural decisions
•Executing repetitive coding tasks such as refactoring, test generation, and boilerplate code creation without manual implementation

•Creating new software features from high-level requirements with minimal human guidance
•Debugging and fixing existing code issues through AI-powered analysis and solution generation
•Developing entire projects from scratch by breaking down complex objectives into manageable coding tasks

Which is more popular, Claude Code or Devika?: Claude Code has more GitHub stars (148,932 vs 19,556).
Which is more actively developed, Claude Code or Devika?: Claude Code had more commits in the last 90 days (210 vs 0).
Should I use Claude Code or Devika?: Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.