Claude-Code-Game-Studios vs Orca
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Orca is growing faster: +18,590 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +1,190 for Claude-Code-Game-Studios.
- Pick Claude-Code-Game-Studios for: turn Claude Code into a full game dev studio — 49 AI agents, 72 workflow skills, and a complete coordination. Pick Orca for: orca is the ADE for working with a fleet of parallel agents.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
C
Claude-Code-Game-Studiosopen-source
Turn Claude Code into a full game dev studio — 49 AI agents, 72 workflow skills, and a complete coordination system mirroring real studio hierarchy.
O
Orcaopen-source
Orca is the ADE for working with a fleet of parallel agents. Run any coding agent with your own subscription. Available on desktop, mobile and remote runtime.
Metrics
| Claude-Code-Game-Studios | Orca | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 25.7k | 84.1k |
| Star velocity /mo | 1.2k | 18.6k |
| Commits (90d) | 3 | 6.6k |
| Releases (6m) | 5 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.6628595995811273 | 0.953845632256653 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Claude-Code-Game-Studios or Orca?
- Orca has more GitHub stars (84,122 vs 25,693).
- Which is more actively developed, Claude-Code-Game-Studios or Orca?
- Orca had more commits in the last 90 days (6,597 vs 3).
- Should I use Claude-Code-Game-Studios or Orca?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.