Claude-Code-Game-Studios vs omp
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- omp is growing faster: +2,860 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +1,190 for Claude-Code-Game-Studios.
- Pick Claude-Code-Game-Studios for: turn Claude Code into a full game dev studio — 49 AI agents, 72 workflow skills, and a complete coordination. Pick omp for: ⌥ Coding agent with the IDE wired in.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
C
Claude-Code-Game-Studiosopen-source
Turn Claude Code into a full game dev studio — 49 AI agents, 72 workflow skills, and a complete coordination system mirroring real studio hierarchy.
o
ompopen-source
⌥ Coding agent with the IDE wired in. Built by Stencil Labs.
Metrics
| Claude-Code-Game-Studios | omp | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 25.7k | 34.2k |
| Star velocity /mo | 1.2k | 2.9k |
| Commits (90d) | 3 | 14.0k |
| Releases (6m) | 5 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.6628595995811273 | 0.9294757830416892 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Claude-Code-Game-Studios or omp?
- omp has more GitHub stars (34,159 vs 25,693).
- Which is more actively developed, Claude-Code-Game-Studios or omp?
- omp had more commits in the last 90 days (14,033 vs 3).
- Should I use Claude-Code-Game-Studios or omp?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.