Chrome DevTools for agents vs invisible_playwright_mcp
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Chrome DevTools for agents is growing faster: +930 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +360 for invisible_playwright_mcp.
- Pick Chrome DevTools for agents for: chrome DevTools for coding agents. Pick invisible_playwright_mcp for: mCP server for AI browser automation with Playwright on anti-detect Firefox and a standalone web UI.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
C
Chrome DevTools for agentsopen-source
Chrome DevTools for coding agents
i
invisible_playwright_mcpopen-source
MCP server for AI browser automation with Playwright on anti-detect Firefox and a standalone web UI
Metrics
| Chrome DevTools for agents | invisible_playwright_mcp | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 52.9k | 31.8k |
| Star velocity /mo | 930 | 360 |
| Commits (90d) | 350 | 298 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | 7.9M | — |
| Overall score | 0.8216627288549094 | 0.765829231577211 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Chrome DevTools for agents or invisible_playwright_mcp?
- Chrome DevTools for agents has more GitHub stars (52,903 vs 31,763).
- Which is more actively developed, Chrome DevTools for agents or invisible_playwright_mcp?
- Chrome DevTools for agents had more commits in the last 90 days (350 vs 298).
- Should I use Chrome DevTools for agents or invisible_playwright_mcp?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.