Chrome DevTools for agents vs Context Mode
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Context Mode is growing faster: +7,280 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +930 for Chrome DevTools for agents.
- Pick Chrome DevTools for agents for: chrome DevTools for coding agents. Pick Context Mode for: mCP server that sandboxes tool output, persists session memory, and enforces routing across platforms.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
C
Chrome DevTools for agentsopen-source
Chrome DevTools for coding agents
C
Context Modeopen-source
MCP server that sandboxes tool output, persists session memory, and enforces routing across platforms
Metrics
| Chrome DevTools for agents | Context Mode | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 52.9k | 25.1k |
| Star velocity /mo | 930 | 7.3k |
| Commits (90d) | 350 | 141 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | 7.9M | 88.9K |
| Overall score | 0.8216627288549094 | 0.8332926937375552 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Chrome DevTools for agents or Context Mode?
- Chrome DevTools for agents has more GitHub stars (52,903 vs 25,150).
- Which is more actively developed, Chrome DevTools for agents or Context Mode?
- Chrome DevTools for agents had more commits in the last 90 days (350 vs 141).
- Should I use Chrome DevTools for agents or Context Mode?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.