cc-haha vs Kortix
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- cc-haha is growing faster: +540 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +30 for Kortix.
- Pick cc-haha for: cross-platform desktop workspace for Claude Code with multi-agent sessions, Git worktrees, and diff review. Pick Kortix for: the open-source AI Management System.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
c
cc-hahaopen-source
Cross-platform desktop workspace for Claude Code with multi-agent sessions, Git worktrees, and diff review
K
Kortixopen-source
The open-source AI Management System
Metrics
| cc-haha | Kortix | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 14.8k | 20.2k |
| Star velocity /mo | 540 | 30 |
| Commits (90d) | 878 | 8.3k |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.838847826686706 | 0.7431479549686046 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, cc-haha or Kortix?
- Kortix has more GitHub stars (20,240 vs 14,829).
- Which is more actively developed, cc-haha or Kortix?
- Kortix had more commits in the last 90 days (8,338 vs 878).
- Should I use cc-haha or Kortix?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.