cc-haha vs OpenHuman
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- OpenHuman is growing faster: +3,180 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +540 for cc-haha.
- Pick cc-haha for: cross-platform desktop workspace for Claude Code with multi-agent sessions, Git worktrees, and diff review. Pick OpenHuman for: openHuman is the fastest, cheapest, most efficient open-source agent harness.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
c
cc-hahaopen-source
Cross-platform desktop workspace for Claude Code with multi-agent sessions, Git worktrees, and diff review
O
OpenHumanopen-source
OpenHuman is the fastest, cheapest, most efficient open-source agent harness. Written in Rust
Metrics
| cc-haha | OpenHuman | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 14.8k | 40.4k |
| Star velocity /mo | 540 | 3.2k |
| Commits (90d) | 878 | 22.6k |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.838847826686706 | 0.9408550749378012 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, cc-haha or OpenHuman?
- OpenHuman has more GitHub stars (40,447 vs 14,829).
- Which is more actively developed, cc-haha or OpenHuman?
- OpenHuman had more commits in the last 90 days (22,600 vs 878).
- Should I use cc-haha or OpenHuman?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.