cc-haha vs holaOS
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- cc-haha is growing faster: +560 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +0 for holaOS.
- Pick cc-haha for: cross-platform desktop workspace for Claude Code with multi-agent sessions, Git worktrees, and diff review. Pick holaOS for: open-source, local-first workspace for enterprises to assemble AI agents, apps, and integrations.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
c
cc-hahaopen-source
Cross-platform desktop workspace for Claude Code with multi-agent sessions, Git worktrees, and diff review
h
holaOSopen-source
Open-source, local-first workspace for enterprises to assemble AI agents, apps, and integrations
Metrics
| cc-haha | holaOS | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 14.8k | 11.5k |
| Star velocity /mo | 560 | 0 |
| Commits (90d) | 875 | 157 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 1 |
| Overall score | 0.8304883672793256 | 0.3694863991851925 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, cc-haha or holaOS?
- cc-haha has more GitHub stars (14,849 vs 11,455).
- Which is more actively developed, cc-haha or holaOS?
- cc-haha had more commits in the last 90 days (875 vs 157).
- Should I use cc-haha or holaOS?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.