cc-haha vs HERMES DESKTOP
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- cc-haha is growing faster: +560 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +60 for HERMES DESKTOP.
- Pick cc-haha for: cross-platform desktop workspace for Claude Code with multi-agent sessions, Git worktrees, and diff review. Pick HERMES DESKTOP for: desktop Companion for Hermes Agent.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
c
cc-hahaopen-source
Cross-platform desktop workspace for Claude Code with multi-agent sessions, Git worktrees, and diff review
H
HERMES DESKTOPopen-source
Desktop Companion for Hermes Agent
Metrics
| cc-haha | HERMES DESKTOP | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 14.8k | 14.3k |
| Star velocity /mo | 560 | 60 |
| Commits (90d) | 875 | 231 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.8304883672793256 | 0.6371283811310458 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, cc-haha or HERMES DESKTOP?
- cc-haha has more GitHub stars (14,849 vs 14,350).
- Which is more actively developed, cc-haha or HERMES DESKTOP?
- cc-haha had more commits in the last 90 days (875 vs 231).
- Should I use cc-haha or HERMES DESKTOP?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.