cc-haha vs hermes-agent
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- hermes-agent is growing faster: +5,760 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +540 for cc-haha.
- Pick cc-haha for: cross-platform desktop workspace for Claude Code with multi-agent sessions, Git worktrees, and diff review. Pick hermes-agent for: the agent that grows with you.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
c
cc-hahaopen-source
Cross-platform desktop workspace for Claude Code with multi-agent sessions, Git worktrees, and diff review
h
hermes-agentopen-source
The agent that grows with you
Metrics
| cc-haha | hermes-agent | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 14.8k | 250.7k |
| Star velocity /mo | 540 | 5.8k |
| Commits (90d) | 878 | 32.9k |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.838847826686706 | 0.9501761663348766 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, cc-haha or hermes-agent?
- hermes-agent has more GitHub stars (250,690 vs 14,829).
- Which is more actively developed, cc-haha or hermes-agent?
- hermes-agent had more commits in the last 90 days (32,889 vs 878).
- Should I use cc-haha or hermes-agent?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.