cc-haha vs Ekko Studio
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- cc-haha is growing faster: +540 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +345 for Ekko Studio.
- Pick cc-haha for: cross-platform desktop workspace for Claude Code with multi-agent sessions, Git worktrees, and diff review. Pick Ekko Studio for: ekko Studio is a local-first AI workspace for multi-agent chat, coding, and visual workflows, available.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
c
cc-hahaopen-source
Cross-platform desktop workspace for Claude Code with multi-agent sessions, Git worktrees, and diff review
E
Ekko Studioopen-source
Ekko Studio is a local-first AI workspace for multi-agent chat, coding, and visual workflows, available on desktop and the web.
Metrics
| cc-haha | Ekko Studio | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 14.8k | 11.3k |
| Star velocity /mo | 540 | 345 |
| Commits (90d) | 878 | 643 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.838847826686706 | 0.8024328873269815 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, cc-haha or Ekko Studio?
- cc-haha has more GitHub stars (14,829 vs 11,283).
- Which is more actively developed, cc-haha or Ekko Studio?
- cc-haha had more commits in the last 90 days (878 vs 643).
- Should I use cc-haha or Ekko Studio?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.