cc-haha vs Eigent
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- cc-haha is growing faster: +540 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +75 for Eigent.
- Pick cc-haha for: cross-platform desktop workspace for Claude Code with multi-agent sessions, Git worktrees, and diff review. Pick Eigent for: eigent: The Open Source Cowork Desktop - Local and Free Alternative to Claude Cowork and Codex.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
c
cc-hahaopen-source
Cross-platform desktop workspace for Claude Code with multi-agent sessions, Git worktrees, and diff review
E
Eigentopen-source
Eigent: The Open Source Cowork Desktop - Local and Free Alternative to Claude Cowork and Codex
Metrics
| cc-haha | Eigent | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 14.8k | 15.5k |
| Star velocity /mo | 540 | 75 |
| Commits (90d) | 878 | 149 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 8 |
| Overall score | 0.838847826686706 | 0.6323735272409425 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, cc-haha or Eigent?
- Eigent has more GitHub stars (15,456 vs 14,829).
- Which is more actively developed, cc-haha or Eigent?
- cc-haha had more commits in the last 90 days (878 vs 149).
- Should I use cc-haha or Eigent?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.