cc-haha vs DeepSeek Harness
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- DeepSeek Harness is growing faster: +16,095 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +540 for cc-haha.
- Pick cc-haha for: cross-platform desktop workspace for Claude Code with multi-agent sessions, Git worktrees, and diff review. Pick DeepSeek Harness for: deepSeek Harness: Everything is a Plugin.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
c
cc-hahaopen-source
Cross-platform desktop workspace for Claude Code with multi-agent sessions, Git worktrees, and diff review
D
DeepSeek Harnessopen-source
DeepSeek Harness: Everything is a Plugin.
Metrics
| cc-haha | DeepSeek Harness | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 14.8k | 242.1k |
| Star velocity /mo | 540 | 16.1k |
| Commits (90d) | 878 | 19.6k |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.838847826686706 | 0.9504253212996784 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, cc-haha or DeepSeek Harness?
- DeepSeek Harness has more GitHub stars (242,104 vs 14,829).
- Which is more actively developed, cc-haha or DeepSeek Harness?
- DeepSeek Harness had more commits in the last 90 days (19,632 vs 878).
- Should I use cc-haha or DeepSeek Harness?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.