cc-haha vs Cherry Studio

Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools

Short answer

  • Cherry Studio is growing faster: +1,569 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +540 for cc-haha.
  • Pick cc-haha for: cross-platform desktop workspace for Claude Code with multi-agent sessions, Git worktrees, and diff review. Pick Cherry Studio for: aI productivity studio with smart chat, autonomous agents, and 300+ assistants.

From GitHub data refreshed daily.

c
cc-hahaopen-source

Cross-platform desktop workspace for Claude Code with multi-agent sessions, Git worktrees, and diff review

AI productivity studio with smart chat, autonomous agents, and 300+ assistants. Unified access to frontier LLMs

Metrics

cc-hahaCherry Studio
Stars14.8k52.3k
Star velocity /mo5401.6k
Commits (90d)8782.1k
Releases (6m)1010
Overall score0.8388478266867060.9056132900724824

Pros

    • +Unified interface for multiple frontier LLMs and AI models
    • +Extensive collection of 300+ pre-built AI assistants
    • +Strong community support with over 42,000 GitHub stars

    Cons

      • -Desktop application may require installation and system compatibility
      • -Autonomous agent functionality scope and limitations unclear

      Use Cases

        • •Centralized AI workspace for accessing multiple LLM providers
        • •Automated task execution using autonomous agents
        • •Multi-language AI assistance and productivity workflows
        View cc-haha DetailsView Cherry Studio Details

        FAQ

        Which is more popular, cc-haha or Cherry Studio?
        Cherry Studio has more GitHub stars (52,321 vs 14,829).
        Which is more actively developed, cc-haha or Cherry Studio?
        Cherry Studio had more commits in the last 90 days (2,066 vs 878).
        Should I use cc-haha or Cherry Studio?
        Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.