Casdoor vs Kong
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Kong is growing faster: +120 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +75 for Casdoor.
- Pick Casdoor for: open-source, self-hosted IAM and authentication server with a web console, OAuth, OIDC, SAML, LDAP, and MCP. Pick Kong for: the API and AI Gateway.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
C
Casdooropen-source
Open-source, self-hosted IAM and authentication server with a web console, OAuth, OIDC, SAML, LDAP, and MCP
K
Kongopen-source
π¦ The API and AI Gateway
Metrics
| Casdoor | Kong | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 14.5k | 44.2k |
| Star velocity /mo | 75 | 120 |
| Commits (90d) | 327 | 10 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 2 |
| Overall score | 0.700298686399236 | 0.5611443994303702 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Casdoor or Kong?
- Kong has more GitHub stars (44,233 vs 14,506).
- Which is more actively developed, Casdoor or Kong?
- Casdoor had more commits in the last 90 days (327 vs 10).
- Should I use Casdoor or Kong?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.