Casdoor vs Pascal Editor
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Pascal Editor is growing faster: +2,010 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +50 for Casdoor.
- Pick Casdoor for: open-source, self-hosted IAM and authentication server with a web console, OAuth, OIDC, SAML, LDAP, and MCP. Pick Pascal Editor for: open-source 3D architectural editor with a local CLI, MCP tools, and practical workflows for humans and AI.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
C
Casdooropen-source
Open-source, self-hosted IAM and authentication server with a web console, OAuth, OIDC, SAML, LDAP, and MCP
P
Pascal Editoropen-source
Open-source 3D architectural editor with a local CLI, MCP tools, and practical workflows for humans and AI agents.
Metrics
| Casdoor | Pascal Editor | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 14.5k | 24.6k |
| Star velocity /mo | 50 | 2.0k |
| Commits (90d) | 329 | 805 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.6681327502330521 | 0.8741448741154466 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Casdoor or Pascal Editor?
- Pascal Editor has more GitHub stars (24,583 vs 14,506).
- Which is more actively developed, Casdoor or Pascal Editor?
- Pascal Editor had more commits in the last 90 days (805 vs 329).
- Should I use Casdoor or Pascal Editor?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.