Casdoor vs Context Mode
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Context Mode is growing faster: +7,380 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +75 for Casdoor.
- Pick Casdoor for: open-source, self-hosted IAM and authentication server with a web console, OAuth, OIDC, SAML, LDAP, and MCP. Pick Context Mode for: mCP server that sandboxes tool output, persists session memory, and enforces routing across platforms.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
C
Casdooropen-source
Open-source, self-hosted IAM and authentication server with a web console, OAuth, OIDC, SAML, LDAP, and MCP
C
Context Modeopen-source
MCP server that sandboxes tool output, persists session memory, and enforces routing across platforms
Metrics
| Casdoor | Context Mode | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 14.5k | 24.9k |
| Star velocity /mo | 75 | 7.4k |
| Commits (90d) | 327 | 143 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.700298686399236 | 0.8475478487279013 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Casdoor or Context Mode?
- Context Mode has more GitHub stars (24,914 vs 14,506).
- Which is more actively developed, Casdoor or Context Mode?
- Casdoor had more commits in the last 90 days (327 vs 143).
- Should I use Casdoor or Context Mode?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.