Casdoor vs codebase-memory-mcp
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- codebase-memory-mcp is growing faster: +1,620 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +50 for Casdoor.
- Pick Casdoor for: open-source, self-hosted IAM and authentication server with a web console, OAuth, OIDC, SAML, LDAP, and MCP. Pick codebase-memory-mcp for: mCP server indexing codebases into a persistent knowledge graph with tree-sitter and hybrid LSP.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
C
Casdooropen-source
Open-source, self-hosted IAM and authentication server with a web console, OAuth, OIDC, SAML, LDAP, and MCP
c
codebase-memory-mcpopen-source
MCP server indexing codebases into a persistent knowledge graph with tree-sitter and hybrid LSP
Metrics
| Casdoor | codebase-memory-mcp | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 14.5k | 45.7k |
| Star velocity /mo | 50 | 1.6k |
| Commits (90d) | 329 | 2.0k |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | — | 64.6K |
| Overall score | 0.6681327502330521 | 0.8944758248474755 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Casdoor or codebase-memory-mcp?
- codebase-memory-mcp has more GitHub stars (45,713 vs 14,506).
- Which is more actively developed, Casdoor or codebase-memory-mcp?
- codebase-memory-mcp had more commits in the last 90 days (2,034 vs 329).
- Should I use Casdoor or codebase-memory-mcp?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.