Which is more popular, Automata or Cursor?

Cursor has more GitHub stars (33,255 vs 682).

Which is more actively developed, Automata or Cursor?

Automata had more commits in the last 90 days (0 vs 0).

Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.

Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools

Automata has had no commit in 37 months; Cursor is actively maintained.
Cursor is growing faster: +116 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +1 for Automata.
Pick Automata for: automata: A self-coding agent. Pick Cursor for: the AI Code Editor.

From GitHub data refreshed daily.

Automataopen-source

Automata: A self-coding agent

The AI Code Editor

+High community adoption with 32,000+ GitHub stars indicating strong developer interest
+Combines traditional code editing with AI coding agent capabilities in a single tool
+Active community support through dedicated forum for user feedback and feature requests

-Limited public documentation available about specific features and capabilities
-Requires download and installation rather than being browser-based for immediate access

•Developers looking to integrate AI assistance directly into their code editing workflow
•Teams wanting to combine traditional IDE functionality with modern AI coding capabilities
•Programmers seeking an AI-enhanced alternative to conventional code editors

Which is more popular, Automata or Cursor?: Cursor has more GitHub stars (33,255 vs 682).
Which is more actively developed, Automata or Cursor?: Automata had more commits in the last 90 days (0 vs 0).
Should I use Automata or Cursor?: Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.