Which is more popular, AutoGen or FastAgency?

AutoGen has more GitHub stars (61,253 vs 548).

Which is more actively developed, AutoGen or FastAgency?

AutoGen had more commits in the last 90 days (0 vs 0).

Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.

Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools

FastAgency has had no commit in 9 months; AutoGen is actively maintained.
AutoGen is growing faster: +787 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +3 for FastAgency.
Pick AutoGen for: a programming framework for agentic AI. Pick FastAgency for: the fastest way to bring multi-agent workflows to production.

From GitHub data refreshed daily.

A programming framework for agentic AI

FastAgencyopen-source

The fastest way to bring multi-agent workflows to production.

+Unified interface for deploying AG2 workflows to production with minimal code changes
+Supports both web chat applications and REST API services from the same codebase
+Built-in scaling capabilities with distributed architecture and message broker coordination

-Dependent on AG2 framework, limiting flexibility to other agent frameworks
-Relatively small community with 532 GitHub stars compared to major frameworks
-Limited documentation available in the provided materials for advanced features

•Deploying AG2 multi-agent chatbots as web applications for customer service or support
•Creating REST API services that expose agent workflows for integration with existing systems
•Building scalable distributed agent systems that coordinate across multiple servers or datacenters

Which is more popular, AutoGen or FastAgency?: AutoGen has more GitHub stars (61,253 vs 548).
Which is more actively developed, AutoGen or FastAgency?: AutoGen had more commits in the last 90 days (0 vs 0).
Should I use AutoGen or FastAgency?: Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.