Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep vs omp
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- omp is growing faster: +3,030 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +630 for Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep.
- Pick Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep for: markdown skills for autonomous ML research: cross-model review, idea discovery, experiment automation. Pick omp for: ⌥ Coding agent with the IDE wired in.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
A
Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleepopen-source
Markdown skills for autonomous ML research: cross-model review, idea discovery, experiment automation
o
ompopen-source
⌥ Coding agent with the IDE wired in. Built by Stencil Labs.
Metrics
| Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep | omp | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 16.9k | 34.1k |
| Star velocity /mo | 630 | 3.0k |
| Commits (90d) | 199 | 14.0k |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.7887899098762867 | 0.9384072578113428 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep or omp?
- omp has more GitHub stars (34,075 vs 16,899).
- Which is more actively developed, Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep or omp?
- omp had more commits in the last 90 days (13,995 vs 199).
- Should I use Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep or omp?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.