Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vs Khazix Skills

Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools

Short answer

  • Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills is growing faster: +1,275 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +420 for Khazix Skills.
  • Pick Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills for: open-source collection of 818 cybersecurity skills for AI agents, mapped to six frameworks. Pick Khazix Skills for: 数字生命卡兹克开源的 AI Skills 合集 | Agent Skills: leader(帮你定义目标), neat-freak 洁癖, hv-analysis, khazix-writer & more —.

From GitHub data refreshed daily.

Open-source collection of 818 cybersecurity skills for AI agents, mapped to six frameworks

K
Khazix Skillsopen-source

数字生命卡兹克开源的 AI Skills 合集 | Agent Skills: leader(帮你定义目标), neat-freak 洁癖, hv-analysis, khazix-writer & more — Claude Code, Codex & 40+ agents

Metrics

Anthropic-Cybersecurity-SkillsKhazix Skills
Stars33.7k21.1k
Star velocity /mo1.3k420
Commits (90d)4338
Releases (6m)20
Overall score0.64622487191418240.6083367504195641

FAQ

Which is more popular, Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills or Khazix Skills?
Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills has more GitHub stars (33,707 vs 21,104).
Which is more actively developed, Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills or Khazix Skills?
Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills had more commits in the last 90 days (43 vs 38).
Should I use Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills or Khazix Skills?
Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.