Agno vs Trigger.dev
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Agno is growing faster: +1,080 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +130 for Trigger.dev.
- Pick Agno for: build, run, and manage agent platforms. Pick Trigger.dev for: trigger.dev – build and deploy durable AI agents and workflows.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
A
Agnoopen-source
Build, run, and manage agent platforms.
T
Trigger.devopen-source
Trigger.dev – build and deploy durable AI agents and workflows
Metrics
| Agno | Trigger.dev | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 42.5k | 16.5k |
| Star velocity /mo | 1.1k | 130 |
| Commits (90d) | 351 | 713 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | 1.7M | 2.9M |
| Overall score | 0.8265030856638511 | 0.7330060666473396 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Agno or Trigger.dev?
- Agno has more GitHub stars (42,524 vs 16,458).
- Which is more actively developed, Agno or Trigger.dev?
- Trigger.dev had more commits in the last 90 days (713 vs 351).
- Should I use Agno or Trigger.dev?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.