Agno vs OpenHuman
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- OpenHuman is growing faster: +2,510 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +1,080 for Agno.
- Pick Agno for: build, run, and manage agent platforms. Pick OpenHuman for: openHuman is the fastest, cheapest, most efficient open-source agent harness.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
A
Agnoopen-source
Build, run, and manage agent platforms.
O
OpenHumanopen-source
OpenHuman is the fastest, cheapest, most efficient open-source agent harness. Written in Rust
Metrics
| Agno | OpenHuman | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 42.5k | 40.5k |
| Star velocity /mo | 1.1k | 2.5k |
| Commits (90d) | 351 | 22.8k |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | 1.7M | — |
| Overall score | 0.8265030856638511 | 0.9308227395695856 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Agno or OpenHuman?
- Agno has more GitHub stars (42,524 vs 40,486).
- Which is more actively developed, Agno or OpenHuman?
- OpenHuman had more commits in the last 90 days (22,774 vs 351).
- Should I use Agno or OpenHuman?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.