Agno vs LobeHub
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Agno is growing faster: +1,185 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +435 for LobeHub.
- Pick Agno for: build, run, and manage agent platforms. Pick LobeHub for: lobeHub is your Chief Agent Operator, organizing your agents into 7×24 operations by hiring, scheduling.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
A
Agnoopen-source
Build, run, and manage agent platforms.
L
LobeHubopen-source
🤯 LobeHub is your Chief Agent Operator, organizing your agents into 7×24 operations by hiring, scheduling, and reporting on your entire AI team.
Metrics
| Agno | LobeHub | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 42.5k | 83.0k |
| Star velocity /mo | 1.2k | 435 |
| Commits (90d) | 350 | 2.4k |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.8460981818178599 | 0.8533519039832247 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Agno or LobeHub?
- LobeHub has more GitHub stars (82,957 vs 42,495).
- Which is more actively developed, Agno or LobeHub?
- LobeHub had more commits in the last 90 days (2,430 vs 350).
- Should I use Agno or LobeHub?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.