Agno vs DeepSeek Harness
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- DeepSeek Harness is growing faster: +16,095 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +1,185 for Agno.
- Pick Agno for: build, run, and manage agent platforms. Pick DeepSeek Harness for: deepSeek Harness: Everything is a Plugin.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
A
Agnoopen-source
Build, run, and manage agent platforms.
D
DeepSeek Harnessopen-source
DeepSeek Harness: Everything is a Plugin.
Metrics
| Agno | DeepSeek Harness | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 42.5k | 242.1k |
| Star velocity /mo | 1.2k | 16.1k |
| Commits (90d) | 350 | 19.6k |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.8460981818178599 | 0.9504253212996784 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Agno or DeepSeek Harness?
- DeepSeek Harness has more GitHub stars (242,104 vs 42,495).
- Which is more actively developed, Agno or DeepSeek Harness?
- DeepSeek Harness had more commits in the last 90 days (19,632 vs 350).
- Should I use Agno or DeepSeek Harness?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.