AgentRun vs OpenSandbox
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- AgentRun has had no commit in 23 months; OpenSandbox is actively maintained (1,532 commits in the last 90 days).
- OpenSandbox is growing faster: +360 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +2 for AgentRun.
- Pick AgentRun for: the easiest, and fastest way to run AI-generated Python code safely. Pick OpenSandbox for: secure, Fast, and Extensible Sandbox runtime for AI agents.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
AgentRunopen-source
The easiest, and fastest way to run AI-generated Python code safely
O
OpenSandboxopen-source
Secure, Fast, and Extensible Sandbox runtime for AI agents.
Metrics
| AgentRun | OpenSandbox | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 380 | 15.7k |
| Star velocity /mo | 1.8947368421052633 | 360 |
| Commits (90d) | 0 | 1.5k |
| Releases (6m) | 0 | 10 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | — | 372.2K |
| Overall score | 0.16537378244464526 | 0.8167282211378699 |
Pros
- +多层安全防护:结合 Docker 容器隔离和 RestrictedPython 代码检查,有效防止恶意代码执行和系统破坏
- +零配置易用性:单行代码即可集成,自动处理容器管理、依赖安装和资源限制,大幅降低使用门槛
- +生产就绪:97% 测试覆盖率、完整静态类型支持、仅两个依赖项,确保高稳定性和可维护性
Cons
- -依赖 Docker 运行时:需要系统安装 Docker,在某些受限环境(如无容器权限的云平台)中可能无法使用
- -执行开销:容器启动和依赖安装会增加延迟,可能不适合对响应时间要求极高的实时应用
Use Cases
- •AI 聊天机器人增强:为 ChatGPT、Claude 等模型添加数学计算、数据分析和图表生成能力,安全执行用户请求的复杂运算
- •自动化数据科学:让 AI 助手安全运行 pandas、numpy 代码进行数据处理和可视化,无需担心恶意代码风险
- •教育编程平台:在线编程教学平台中安全执行学生提交的代码,提供实时反馈而不影响系统安全
FAQ
- Which is more popular, AgentRun or OpenSandbox?
- OpenSandbox has more GitHub stars (15,653 vs 380).
- Which is more actively developed, AgentRun or OpenSandbox?
- OpenSandbox had more commits in the last 90 days (1,532 vs 0).
- Should I use AgentRun or OpenSandbox?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.