Agent-S vs screenpipe
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Agent-S is growing faster: +470 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +130 for screenpipe.
- Pick Agent-S for: agent S: an open agentic framework that uses computers like a human. Pick screenpipe for: yC (S26) | Open Computer History | Record your screen continuously locally and provide context to your agents.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
A
Agent-Sopen-source
Agent S: an open agentic framework that uses computers like a human
s
screenpipeopen-source
YC (S26) | Open Computer History | Record your screen continuously locally and provide context to your agents (Claude, Codex, Openclaw, Hermes, Runner...)
Metrics
| Agent-S | screenpipe | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 12.5k | 21.8k |
| Star velocity /mo | 470 | 130 |
| Commits (90d) | 4 | 2.8k |
| Releases (6m) | 0 | 10 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | 1.1K | 30.8K |
| Overall score | 0.4938801311902547 | 0.7762751608008367 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Agent-S or screenpipe?
- screenpipe has more GitHub stars (21,796 vs 12,509).
- Which is more actively developed, Agent-S or screenpipe?
- screenpipe had more commits in the last 90 days (2,810 vs 4).
- Should I use Agent-S or screenpipe?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.