Agent-Reach vs XHS-Downloader
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Agent-Reach is growing faster: +19,725 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +180 for XHS-Downloader.
- Pick Agent-Reach for: give your AI agent eyes to see the entire internet. Pick XHS-Downloader for: 小红书（XiaoHongShu、RedNote）链接提取/作品采集工具.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
A
Agent-Reachopen-source
Give your AI agent eyes to see the entire internet. Read & search Twitter, Reddit, YouTube, GitHub, Bilibili, XiaoHongShu — one CLI, zero API fees.
X
XHS-Downloaderopen-source
小红书（XiaoHongShu、RedNote）链接提取/作品采集工具
Metrics
| Agent-Reach | XHS-Downloader | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 87.8k | 12.9k |
| Star velocity /mo | 19.7k | 180 |
| Commits (90d) | 65 | 79 |
| Releases (6m) | 3 | 1 |
| Overall score | 0.7333171528435694 | 0.5824880096767935 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Agent-Reach or XHS-Downloader?
- Agent-Reach has more GitHub stars (87,795 vs 12,889).
- Which is more actively developed, Agent-Reach or XHS-Downloader?
- XHS-Downloader had more commits in the last 90 days (79 vs 65).
- Should I use Agent-Reach or XHS-Downloader?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.