Agent-Reach vs Stagehand
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Agent-Reach is growing faster: +28,430 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +300 for Stagehand.
- Pick Agent-Reach for: give your AI agent eyes to see the entire internet. Pick Stagehand for: the SDK to extract data and interact with any site on the web.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
A
Agent-Reachopen-source
Give your AI agent eyes to see the entire internet. Read & search Twitter, Reddit, YouTube, GitHub, Bilibili, XiaoHongShu — one CLI, zero API fees.
S
Stagehandopen-source
The SDK to extract data and interact with any site on the web. Get started with Claude Code, Codex, Eve, Mastra, and more.
Metrics
| Agent-Reach | Stagehand | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 89.3k | 25.5k |
| Star velocity /mo | 28.4k | 300 |
| Commits (90d) | 65 | 189 |
| Releases (6m) | 3 | 10 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | — | 1.1M |
| Overall score | 0.7149573794740056 | 0.7368322331963058 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Agent-Reach or Stagehand?
- Agent-Reach has more GitHub stars (89,323 vs 25,522).
- Which is more actively developed, Agent-Reach or Stagehand?
- Stagehand had more commits in the last 90 days (189 vs 65).
- Should I use Agent-Reach or Stagehand?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.