Agent-Reach vs Page Agent
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Agent-Reach is growing faster: +19,725 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +405 for Page Agent.
- Pick Agent-Reach for: give your AI agent eyes to see the entire internet. Pick Page Agent for: javaScript in-page GUI agent.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
A
Agent-Reachopen-source
Give your AI agent eyes to see the entire internet. Read & search Twitter, Reddit, YouTube, GitHub, Bilibili, XiaoHongShu — one CLI, zero API fees.
P
Page Agentopen-source
JavaScript in-page GUI agent. Control web interfaces with natural language.
Metrics
| Agent-Reach | Page Agent | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 87.8k | 29.3k |
| Star velocity /mo | 19.7k | 405 |
| Commits (90d) | 65 | 52 |
| Releases (6m) | 3 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.7333171528435694 | 0.6656732657345861 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Agent-Reach or Page Agent?
- Agent-Reach has more GitHub stars (87,795 vs 29,315).
- Which is more actively developed, Agent-Reach or Page Agent?
- Agent-Reach had more commits in the last 90 days (65 vs 52).
- Should I use Agent-Reach or Page Agent?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.