Agent-Reach vs invisible_playwright_mcp
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Agent-Reach is growing faster: +19,725 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +330 for invisible_playwright_mcp.
- Pick Agent-Reach for: give your AI agent eyes to see the entire internet. Pick invisible_playwright_mcp for: mCP server for AI browser automation with Playwright on anti-detect Firefox and a standalone web UI.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
A
Agent-Reachopen-source
Give your AI agent eyes to see the entire internet. Read & search Twitter, Reddit, YouTube, GitHub, Bilibili, XiaoHongShu — one CLI, zero API fees.
i
invisible_playwright_mcpopen-source
MCP server for AI browser automation with Playwright on anti-detect Firefox and a standalone web UI
Metrics
| Agent-Reach | invisible_playwright_mcp | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 87.8k | 31.7k |
| Star velocity /mo | 19.7k | 330 |
| Commits (90d) | 65 | 296 |
| Releases (6m) | 3 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.7333171528435694 | 0.7750235305428677 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Agent-Reach or invisible_playwright_mcp?
- Agent-Reach has more GitHub stars (87,795 vs 31,749).
- Which is more actively developed, Agent-Reach or invisible_playwright_mcp?
- invisible_playwright_mcp had more commits in the last 90 days (296 vs 65).
- Should I use Agent-Reach or invisible_playwright_mcp?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.