Agent Orchestrator vs omp
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- omp is growing faster: +3,030 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +510 for Agent Orchestrator.
- Pick Agent Orchestrator for: run and supervise teams of coding agents from planning to merge. Pick omp for: ⌥ Coding agent with the IDE wired in.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
A
Agent Orchestratoropen-source
Run and supervise teams of coding agents from planning to merge. Any harness (Claude code, codex, +25 more). Desktop, web, mobile, and cloud agents.
o
ompopen-source
⌥ Coding agent with the IDE wired in. Built by Stencil Labs.
Metrics
| Agent Orchestrator | omp | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 12.6k | 34.1k |
| Star velocity /mo | 510 | 3.0k |
| Commits (90d) | 1.4k | 14.0k |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.8511182089549258 | 0.9384072578113428 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Agent Orchestrator or omp?
- omp has more GitHub stars (34,075 vs 12,605).
- Which is more actively developed, Agent Orchestrator or omp?
- omp had more commits in the last 90 days (13,995 vs 1,425).
- Should I use Agent Orchestrator or omp?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.