Agent Orchestrator vs holaOS
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Agent Orchestrator is growing faster: +670 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +0 for holaOS.
- Pick Agent Orchestrator for: run and supervise teams of coding agents from planning to merge. Pick holaOS for: open-source, local-first workspace for enterprises to assemble AI agents, apps, and integrations.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
A
Agent Orchestratoropen-source
Run and supervise teams of coding agents from planning to merge. Any harness (Claude code, codex, +25 more). Desktop, web, mobile, and cloud agents.
h
holaOSopen-source
Open-source, local-first workspace for enterprises to assemble AI agents, apps, and integrations
Metrics
| Agent Orchestrator | holaOS | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 12.6k | 11.5k |
| Star velocity /mo | 670 | 0 |
| Commits (90d) | 1.4k | 157 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 1 |
| Overall score | 0.8570093170826903 | 0.3694863991851925 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Agent Orchestrator or holaOS?
- Agent Orchestrator has more GitHub stars (12,638 vs 11,455).
- Which is more actively developed, Agent Orchestrator or holaOS?
- Agent Orchestrator had more commits in the last 90 days (1,434 vs 157).
- Should I use Agent Orchestrator or holaOS?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.