Agent Orchestrator vs cc-haha
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Pick Agent Orchestrator for: run and supervise teams of coding agents from planning to merge. Pick cc-haha for: cross-platform desktop workspace for Claude Code with multi-agent sessions, Git worktrees, and diff review.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
A
Agent Orchestratoropen-source
Run and supervise teams of coding agents from planning to merge. Any harness (Claude code, codex, +25 more). Desktop, web, mobile, and cloud agents.
c
cc-hahaopen-source
Cross-platform desktop workspace for Claude Code with multi-agent sessions, Git worktrees, and diff review
Metrics
| Agent Orchestrator | cc-haha | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 12.6k | 14.8k |
| Star velocity /mo | 670 | 560 |
| Commits (90d) | 1.4k | 875 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.8570093170826903 | 0.8304883672793256 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Agent Orchestrator or cc-haha?
- cc-haha has more GitHub stars (14,849 vs 12,638).
- Which is more actively developed, Agent Orchestrator or cc-haha?
- Agent Orchestrator had more commits in the last 90 days (1,434 vs 875).
- Should I use Agent Orchestrator or cc-haha?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.