agency-agents 中文版（AI 智能体专家团队） vs OpenHuman
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- OpenHuman is growing faster: +3,180 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +255 for agency-agents 中文版（AI 智能体专家团队）.
- Pick agency-agents 中文版（AI 智能体专家团队） for: chinese community edition with 277 AI agent personas across 20 departments and multi-agent orchestration. Pick OpenHuman for: openHuman is the fastest, cheapest, most efficient open-source agent harness.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
a
agency-agents 中文版（AI 智能体专家团队）open-source
Chinese community edition with 277 AI agent personas across 20 departments and multi-agent orchestration
O
OpenHumanopen-source
OpenHuman is the fastest, cheapest, most efficient open-source agent harness. Written in Rust
Metrics
| agency-agents 中文版（AI 智能体专家团队） | OpenHuman | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 21.0k | 40.4k |
| Star velocity /mo | 255 | 3.2k |
| Commits (90d) | 99 | 22.6k |
| Releases (6m) | 6 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.6693970845352629 | 0.9408550749378012 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, agency-agents 中文版（AI 智能体专家团队） or OpenHuman?
- OpenHuman has more GitHub stars (40,447 vs 21,039).
- Which is more actively developed, agency-agents 中文版（AI 智能体专家团队） or OpenHuman?
- OpenHuman had more commits in the last 90 days (22,600 vs 99).
- Should I use agency-agents 中文版（AI 智能体专家团队） or OpenHuman?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.