agency-agents 中文版（AI 智能体专家团队） vs OmO
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- OmO is growing faster: +810 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +220 for agency-agents 中文版（AI 智能体专家团队）.
- Pick agency-agents 中文版（AI 智能体专家团队） for: chinese community edition with 277 AI agent personas across 20 departments and multi-agent orchestration. Pick OmO for: omO: Just type "mass ulw" keyword with your prompt.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
a
agency-agents 中文版（AI 智能体专家团队）open-source
Chinese community edition with 277 AI agent personas across 20 departments and multi-agent orchestration
O
OmOopen-source
OmO: Just type "mass ulw" keyword with your prompt. Now you are the master of graph engineering.
Metrics
| agency-agents 中文版（AI 智能体专家团队） | OmO | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 21.0k | 69.8k |
| Star velocity /mo | 220 | 810 |
| Commits (90d) | 95 | 9.7k |
| Releases (6m) | 6 | 10 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | 3.4K | 91.7K |
| Overall score | 0.6361902399676242 | 0.8973547831718989 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, agency-agents 中文版（AI 智能体专家团队） or OmO?
- OmO has more GitHub stars (69,768 vs 21,044).
- Which is more actively developed, agency-agents 中文版（AI 智能体专家团队） or OmO?
- OmO had more commits in the last 90 days (9,692 vs 95).
- Should I use agency-agents 中文版（AI 智能体专家团队） or OmO?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.